16p11.2 recurrent region (distal, BP2-BP3) (includes SH2B1)

  • 3
    Haplo
    Score
  • 1
    Triplo
    Score

Region Facts

Region Name
16p11.2 recurrent region (distal, BP2-BP3) (includes SH2B1)
Cytoband
16p11.2
Genomic Coordinates
GRCh37/hg19 chr16:28822635-29046499 NCBI Ensembl UCSC
GRCh38/hg38 chr16:28811314-29035178 NCBI Ensembl UCSC

Dosage Sensitivity Summary (Region)

Dosage ID:
ISCA-37486
Curation Status:
Complete
Issue Type:
Dosage Curation - Region
Description:
The 16p11.2 region contains a cluster of low copy repeats that mediate recurrent copy number changes through non-allelic homologous recombination. This review refers to distal region CNVs involving recurrent breakpoints (BP) BP2 and BP3 (approximately 220 kb). Larger CNVs extending into BP1 and/or BP4 are considered functionally similar to BP2-BP3 CNVs and are included in this review. This region is distal to, and distinct from, the approximately 600 kb recurrent 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 region (TBX6 gene included). Note that genes used as landmarks are not necessarily causative of the phenotype(s) associated with the region.
Haploinsufficiency:
Sufficient Evidence for Haploinsufficiency (3)
Triplosensitivity:
Little Evidence for Triplosensitivity (1)
Related Links:
Last Evaluated:
02/13/2024

Haploinsufficiency (HI) Score Details

HI Score:
3
HI Evidence Strength:
Sufficient Evidence for Haploinsufficiency (Disclaimer)
HI Disease:
  • distal 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome Monarch
HI Evidence:
  • PUBMED: 27240531
    Loviglio et al. (2017) compared BMI, head circumference, and prevalence of autism in a cohort of 110 clinically-ascertained individuals with intellectual disability/developmental delay and obesity from 88 families with the 16p11.2 distal deletion with that of general population controls, as part of their investigation of long-range chromatin interactions. Autism was observed in 23/88 (26%) of deletion carriers. The prevalence of autism was significantly higher in this cohort as compared to the general population (1.5%, 5,338/363,749) (p=2.5E-22, OR = 23.7, Fisher’s exact test). A trend towards obesity (significant, BMI mean Z-score, p=3.1E−14, t-test) and macrocephaly (increased head circumference, HC) was also observed compared to the general population. Second-site deleterious structural variants were identified in 6/88 (7%) of unrelated probands which was notably lower than a previous study (Bachmann-Gagescu et al., 2010; PMID 20808231). The authors also performed analysis of chromatin interactions between the distal and proximal 16p11.2 regions, which have overlapping phenotypes (autism, BMI, HC), using 4C-sequencing, FISH, and Hi-C methods and found evidence of physical and functional interaction between these regions.
  • PUBMED: 20808231
    Bachmann-Gagescu et al. (2010) reported clinical findings associated with 16p11.2 distal deletions in a cohort of patients referred for clinical array CGH testing. A total of 31 patients (29 unrelated) with deletions involving the distal BP2-BP3 region (22 typical BP2-BP3, 9 atypical extending distally into BP1-BP2) were identified. A second genomic imbalance was identified in 6/31 (19%) of patients, 2 of which were pathogenic. Detailed clinical information was available for 6 patients, all of whom had developmental delay/intellectual disability, and none of whom had an additional CNV. Obesity (BMI at or above the 95th percentile) was observed in 4/6 individuals. Additional variable findings in at least 2 patients included speech delay, neuropsychiatric/behavioral problems, and autism. Variable congenital anomalies and dysmorphic features were also observed but were inconsistent across patients. The deletion was de novo in 5/31 cases, maternally inherited in 5/31 cases, paternally inherited in 3/31 cases, and inheritance was unknown in the remaining 18/31 cases. Clinical information for deletion carrier parents was not available. Case-control comparison showed the 16p11.2 distal deletion was enriched in patients (31/23,084; 0.13%) compared to a combined control dataset (1/7700; 0.013%) (p=0.003).
  • PUBMED: 19966786
    Bochukova et al. (2010) used SNP-microarray to identify CNVs in a cohort of 300 patients with severe early-onset obesity, of which a subset (n=143) also had developmental delay (DD). The 16p11.2 distal deletion was identified in 3/157 patients with severe early-onset obesity alone (not seen with DD). MLPA-targeted testing within the 16p11.2 region on a second set of 1062 patients with severe obesity alone identified 2 additional individuals (5 total probands with severe obesity). The deletion was inherited from a parent with obesity in 4/4 individuals where inheritance information was available. Case-control comparison showed the 16p11.2 distal deletion was enriched in patients with severe early-onset obesity alone (5/1,219; 0.41%) compared to a selected group of controls (2/7,366; 0.027%) (p<0.001), although BMI data were not available for the 16p11.2 distal deletion carrier control individuals. Sequencing of the candidate gene SH2B1 within the deleted interval of patient samples did not identify a pathogenic variant on the other allele, suggesting a haploinsufficient mechanism of pathogenicity.
  • PUBMED: 30767844
    Kendall et al. (2019) analyzed the effect of the 16p11.2 distal deletion on cognitive performance and general measures of functioning of 58 deletion carrier adults recruited from the UK Biobank cohort (a large, genotyped group from the general population) compared to non-carrier controls from the same population. Significant differences were observed for 7 of 11 total measurements, including 3 of 7 cognitive measures and 4 of 4 measures of general functioning, the latter of which are not included for CNV evidence scoring. Penetrance for any clinical phenotype associated with this deletion was estimated to be 23% using a previously reported clinical cohort compared to the UK Biobank control database. See also Owen et al. (2018) PMID 30509170 and Macé et al. (2017) PMID 28963451, which use overlapping datasets and showed significant associations of the 16p11.2 distal deletion with high BMI, weight, and other anthropometric traits.
  • PUBMED: 21465664
    Barge-Schaapveld et al. (2011) reported clinical findings of 5 patients from 2 unrelated families with 16p11.2 distal deletions. Clinical features in common in least 3 individuals included developmental delay, craniofacial dysmorphism, behavioral problems, and obesity. In one family, the deletion was inherited from the patient’s father, and detected in the patient’s a sister, both of whom had a history of obesity. In the other family, the father died at a young age and was not tested for the deletion; however, he presented with a phenotype similar to that of his affected sons (learning difficulties, behavioral problems, and dysmorphic facial features), and was presumed to carry the deletion.
  • PUBMED: 23325106
    Guha et al. (2013) studied the prevalence of recurrent CNVs in multiple discovery and replication schizophrenia (SZ) case and control cohorts. The 16p11.2 distal deletion was the only CNV shown to be enriched, with a prevalence of 13/13,850 cases (6 typical BP2-BP3 and 7 BP1-BP3 deletions) versus 3/19,954 controls (Fisher's exact test p = 0.0014; OR = 6.25, 95% CI: 1.78 – 21.93). Phenotypic data was available for a subset of carrier individuals and did not include intellectual disability or a specific clinical profile. Two cases were obese/overweight, and two cases and one control had type 2 diabetes. Where studied, the deletion was maternally inherited in 2 cases from mothers with no history of psychotic disorders, one was noted to have a mood disorder.
HI Evidence Comments:
Deletion of the 16p11.2 distal region is associated with variable and incompletely penetrant phenotypes that most often include obesity, macrocephaly, and developmental delay/intellectual disability and less frequently include autism, behavioral difficulties, non-specific craniofacial dysmorphism, and schizophrenia. When studied, 16p11.2 distal deletions have often been found to be inherited from an unaffected or mildly affected parent. Carrier individuals in the general population, where studied, show generally milder but overlapping phenotypes to those in the clinical population. The expression of any phenotype associated with this deletion has been estimated to be between 23-62%. Case-control comparison studies have shown enrichment of this deletion in clinical populations. Current haploinsufficiency prediction scores suggest at least one gene in this region is loss-of-function intolerant (ATXN2L). Therefore, the haploinsufficiency score is 3. Additional relevant literature is summarized below: Case-Control Studies: PMID: 25217958 Coe et al. (2014) performed a large-scale case-control comparison study of the relative prevalence of CNVs in children with intellectual disability, multiple congenital anomalies, and other developmental phenotypes compared to controls. Deletions of the 16p11.2 distal region were observed in 27/29,085 cases versus 1/19,584 controls (p=1.09E-05; LR: 18.2, CI: 3.75-196), demonstrating enrichment of this deletion in the clinical population. See also Cooper et al. (2011) PMID 21841781, which used an overlapping (older) dataset. PMID: 23258348 Rosenfeld et al. (2013) calculated recurrent CNV penetrance estimates and de novo occurrence frequencies using a database of >48,000 patients referred for clinical genomic microarray testing compared to 22,246 controls. Penetrance of the 16p11.2 distal deletion was estimated to be 62.4% (95% CI: 26.8-94.4). This CNV was de novo in 7/21 (33.3%) clinical cases. Additional Cohort Studies: PMID: 30283035 Sonderby et al. and the ENIGMA-CNV Working Group (2020) examined IQ and brain structure of individuals who carried 16p11.2 distal region CNVs. 16p11.2 distal CNV carriers were compared to non-carrier individuals (controls) from the ENIGMA-CNV discovery dataset. A total of 12 discovery and 3 replication cohort deletion carriers were studied, including at least 3 individuals with deletions extending into the proximal 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 region. Carriers of known secondary pathogenic CNVs, as well as individuals with neurodevelopmental or psychiatric diagnoses, were excluded. Brain morphologic and full-scale IQ measurements were significantly different for the cohort that includes both 16p11.2 distal and distal + proximal CNV carriers as compared to non-CNV carriers from ENIGMA-CNV and Icelandic deCODE control cohorts; however, significance values for the 16p11.2 distal region alone were not reported. Case Reports: PMID: 32537635 Chu et al. (2020) identified a father-daughter pair with a 16p11.2 distal deletion from a cohort of patients with 16p11.2 CNVs who had clinical microarray testing through the UTMB Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory. The proband was a 3-year-old female whose phenotype included developmental delay, dysmorphic facial features, hypotonia and additional variable findings, with normal body weight and head circumference. Less phenotypic information was available for father although he was reported to have normal head size and body weight and no other reported phenotypes. PMID: 32758661 Lengyel et al. (2020) reported a patient with a maternally inherited 16p11.2 distal deletion from a cohort of 75 Hungarian pediatric patients referred to genetics for clinical array CGH testing. The patient was a 2-year-old female with developmental delay, hypotonia, severe obesity, and additional variable findings. The patient’s mother had a history of obesity, but no neurodevelopmental delays.

Triplosensitivity (TS) Score Details

TS Score:
1
TS Evidence Strength:
Little Evidence for Triplosensitivity (Disclaimer)
TS Published Evidence:
  • PUBMED: 27240531
    Loviglio et al. (2017) compared BMI, head circumference, and prevalence of autism in a cohort of 57 clinically-ascertained individuals with intellectual disability/developmental delay and obesity from 49 families with the 16p11.2 distal duplication with that of general population controls, as part of their investigation of long-range chromatin interactions. Autism was observed in 11/49 (22%) duplication carriers. The prevalence of autism was significantly higher in this cohort as compared to the general population (1.5%, 5,338/363,749) (p=1.2E-10; OR=19.4, Fisher’s exact test). A trend towards mirror phenotypes of deletion carriers, decreased BMI (significant, BMI mean Z-score, p=0.005, t-test) and decreased head circumference (p=1.1E-4, t-test) was also observed in duplication carriers compared to the general population. Second-site deleterious structural variants were identified in 2/49 (4%) of unrelated probands which was notably lower than a previous study (Bachmann-Gagescu et al., 2010; PMID 20808231). The authors also performed analysis of chromatin interactions between the distal and proximal 16p11.2 regions, which have overlapping phenotypes (autism, BMI, HC), using 4C-sequencing, FISH, and Hi-C methods and found evidence of physical and functional interaction between these regions.
  • PUBMED: 20808231
    Bachmann-Gagescu et al. (2010) reported clinical findings associated with 16p11.2 distal duplications in a cohort of patients referred for clinical array CGH testing. A total of 17 patients (all presumably unrelated) with duplications involving the distal BP2-BP3 region (14 typical BP2-BP3, 3 atypical extending distally into BP1-BP2) were identified. A second genomic imbalance that was either clinically significant or of uncertain significance was identified in 6/17 (35%) of patients. Detailed clinical information was available for 5 patients (unknown whether carriers of an additional CNV). Clinical findings in common included speech delay in 3/5, autism in 2/5, and cleft palate and cardiovascular findings in 2/5 patients. Inheritance was de novo in 1/5, inherited in 4/5 (maternal in all 4), and unknown in the remaining 12/17 probands. Clinical information for duplication carrier parents was unavailable.
  • PUBMED: 30803986
    Sadler et al. (2019) studied the association between the distal 16p11.2 duplication and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Case-control comparison using discovery and replication AIS and control cohorts identified by a combination of exome sequencing and microarrays showed the 16p11.2 distal duplication was significantly enriched (18/2727 cases; 0.7% vs 8/19,584 controls; 0.04%; p=2.28×10−11, OR=16.15). Duplication carriers had a lower BMI than controls but the difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, review of patient records (imaging and/or reports) within the Geisinger health system identified evidence or risk for AIS in 30% (20/66) of 16p11.2 duplication (including SH2B1) carriers versus 7.6% (10/132) of similarly evaluated age- and sex-matched non-duplication carrier controls. 16p11.2 duplication carrier individuals with developmental disability were excluded from this study; one case had a diagnosis of ADHD. The authors conclude that 16p11.2 duplications may explain up to 1% of AIS, possibly through alteration of nearby genes, such as TBX6, and confer a 30% lifetime risk of scoliosis. This is a 4-fold increased risk over the general population (P=5.6×10−4, OR=3.9).
TS Evidence Comments:
Evidence in support of the pathogenicity of recurrent 16p11.2 distal duplication is limited at this time. The number of independent studies of this CNV are somewhat limited in the literature and phenotypes documented across them are incomplete. Duplications of this region have been reported in association with variable and relatively nonspecific clinical phenotypes that include reduced head circumference/microcephaly, reduced BMI, scoliosis, autism, ADHD, and differences in brain morphology that are measurable but of uncertain clinical significance. The majority of distal 16p11.2 duplications are inherited, and parental phenotype information is limited. The expression of any clinically ascertained phenotype associated with this duplication has been estimated to be 11%. This has led to variability in how this region is reported clinically. Case-control comparison studies have shown enrichment of this duplication in clinical populations. A study analyzing the effect of recurrent CNVs in CNV carriers identified from the general population showed that 16p11.2 duplication carriers do not show measurable differences in cognitive performance as compared to non-carrier controls. Therefore, the triplosensitivity score is 1. Additional relevant literature is summarized below: Case-Control Studies: PMID: 25217958 Coe et al. (2014) performed a large-scale case-control comparison study of the relative prevalence of CNVs in children with intellectual disability, multiple congenital anomalies, and other developmental phenotypes compared to controls. Duplications of the 16p11.2 distal region were observed in 29/29,085 cases versus 8/19,584 controls (p=0.0137; LR: 2.44, CI: 1.2-5.18). See also Cooper et al. (2011) PMID 21841781, which used an overlapping (older) dataset. PMID: 23258348 Rosenfeld et al. (2013) calculated recurrent CNV penetrance estimates and de novo occurrence frequencies using a database of >48,000 patients referred for clinical genomic microarray testing compared to 22,246 controls. Penetrance of the 16p11.2 distal duplication was estimated to be 11.2% (95% CI: 6.26-19.8). This CNV was de novo in 1/8 (12.5%) clinical cases. General Population Carrier Studies: PMID: 30767844 Kendall et al. (2019) analyzed the effect of the 16p11.2 distal duplication on cognitive performance and general measures of functioning of 136 duplication carrier adults recruited from the UK Biobank cohort (a large, genotyped group from the general population) compared to non-carrier controls from the same population. Significant differences were observed for 6 of 11 total measurements, including 2 of 7 cognitive measures and 4 of 4 measures of general functioning, the latter of which are not included for CNV evidence scoring. However, after multiple testing correction, only the 4 of 4 measures of general functioning remained significant. Penetrance for any clinical phenotype associated with this duplication was estimated to be 11% using a previously reported clinical cohort compared to the UK Biobank control database. See also Owen et al. (2018) PMID 30509170 and Macé et al. (2017) PMID 28963451, which use overlapping datasets and showed significant associations of the 16p11.2 distal duplication with decreased BMI, weight, and other anthropometric traits (mirror phenotypes to those associated with the reciprocal deletion). PMID: 30283035 Sonderby et al. and the ENIGMA-CNV Working Group (2020) examined IQ and brain structure of individuals who carried 16p11.2 distal region CNVs. 16p11.2 distal CNV carriers were compared to non-carrier individuals (controls) from the ENIGMA-CNV discovery dataset. A total of 12 discovery and 6 replication cohort duplication carriers were studied, including at least 3 individuals with duplications extending into the proximal 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 region. Carriers of known secondary pathogenic CNVs, as well as individuals with neurodevelopmental or psychiatric diagnoses, were excluded. Brain morphologic and full-scale IQ measurements were significantly different for the cohort that includes both 16p11.2 distal and distal + proximal CNV carriers as compared to non-CNV carriers from ENIGMA-CNV and Icelandic deCODE control cohorts; however, significance values for 16p11.2 distal region duplications alone were not reported.

Genomic View

Select assembly: (NC_000016.9) ()